POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Povray wishlist : Re: Povray wishlist Server Time
6 Aug 2024 21:38:57 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Povray wishlist  
From: Warp
Date: 18 Mar 2002 09:43:39
Message: <3c95fd1b@news.povray.org>
Christopher James Huff <chr### [at] maccom> wrote:
> The 
> merge shape could be replaced with an option for the union shape

  So we reduce the number of reserved keywords by 0 and we force the parser
to make a much more complicated task (it starts by creating a union, but
in the middle of parsing it suddenly has to convert it to merge).

>, sor 
> could be an option for lathes,

  Same problem. Number of reserved keywords are reduced by 0 and the parser
has to change the lathe to a sor (which might be a bit complicated).

> The prism and polygon primitives could be made 
> into one primitive, or prism, sor, and lathe could be combined into a 
> single sweep primitive.

  You said that this would simplify the syntax. I don't see how. If all of
them are made into one sweep primitive, we end up getting one reserved
keyword more than currently. I don't see how this makes anything simpler.

> Smooth triangles could be made part of ordinary 
> triangles.

  And how do we differentiate between them?

-- 
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.